Tranungkite
Posted on Sunday, April 13 @ 11:42:09 MYT by SongkokPutih
Oleh is
"JEDDAH: Seorang penulis blog Arab Saudi berjaya menghasilkan sebuah video selama enam minit berjudul Schism dengan memetik ayat dalam kitab Injil yang menghalalkan peperangan, sebagai reaksi tindakan ahli parlimen Belanda Geert Wilder menghina Islam menerusi filem bertajuk Fitna.
Raid Al-Saeed, 33, menunjukkan di dalam filemnya, beberapa petikan kitab Injil yang menggalakkan peperangan dan membuat tambahan dengan klip rakaman memperlihatkan kumpulan ekstremis Kristian menyampaikan ceramah berunsur keganasan.
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpiccERJaFk]
“Saya menghasilkannya dalam tempoh kurang 24 jam. Dalam ‘Schism’ saya menggunakan metodologi sama digunakan Wilders dan ia membabitkan petikan yang disalah tafsir,” katanya.
Beliau berkata langkah yang diambil untuk menghasilkan filem itu adalah bagi membuktikan bahawa adalah salah untuk mengadili dan menilai Islam dengan menonton Fitna. Petikan ini dicatatkan Raid pada penghujung filemnya.
“Memang mudah untuk memetik mana-mana bahagian dalam kitab suci dan menyalah tasfirkan petikan itu sehingga membuat ia seolah-olah kelihatan seperti sebuah kitab yang tidak mempunyai nilai kemanusiaan.”
“Inilah yang dilakukan Geert Wilders untuk mendapat sokongan bagi ideologinya yang penuh perasaan kebencian. Berikutan itu saya menghasilkan Schism sebagai satu reaksi balas,” katanya.
Raid berkata beliau tidak percayai ada kitab suci menggalakkan keganasan dan pertumpahan darah.
Beliau berkata Fitna dibuat ‘berasaskan kebencian’ dan Wilders menyalahgunakan ‘kebebasan bersuara yang dinikmatinya,” kata beliau yang menambah, filem Wilders menunjukkan perasaan perkauman dan kebencian yang dimilikinya.
Apabila Raid mengirim klipnya ke YouTube pada 1 Mac, ia dibatalkan 12 jam kemudian dengan satu pesanan daripada laman itu yang menyatakan klip berkenaan bercanggah dengan terma yang ditetapkan.
Raid menulis semula kepada You Tube dan bertanya mengapa filemnya dibatalkan sedang Fitna dibenarkan untuk terus dilayari. Beliau memuat naik filem itu sekali lagi dan menambah mesej kepada pentadbir laman meminta mereka menyaksikan Wilders sebelum membatalkan ‘Schism’.
Video beliau sudah disaksikan lebih 1,800 kali dan kembali semula ke YouTube sejak 2 Mac. Ia juga boleh disaksikan melalui Google.
Raid menegaskan matlamat beliau bukan untuk menyemarakkan kebencian sebaliknya untuk memberitahu dunia bahawa seseorang itu tidak boleh mengadili sesuatu agama atau ideologi dengan tafsiran yang menyalahi hakikat dan perkara sebenar. – Agensi
Saksikan video ini..
"
I went to seven states of Malaysia to participate in the political forum after the general elections in the past few weeks. The significant gain from the forum was not only applause from the audiences but as well the public opinion collected that enabled me to understand the people's thoughts.
When the audience is enthusiastic at asking questions and expressing their opinions by passing down notes or standing in front of the microphone courageously, you will find that the people are really cute.
In fact, the people have a high degree of political awareness and a lot of views are actually different from the past. Most obviously, it would be the view of Chinese on Pas. Chinese no longer think Pas a poisonous snake or a savage beast.
Many people identified the role played by Pas in the elections. They also think Pas is indispensable to Pakatan Rakyat.
Most impressively, the people agreed with the welfare society proposed by Pas and the party's stance on honesty, justice and race relations. It did not mean that they supported Pas, or agree with the party's aim to turn Malaysia into an Islamic state. But the people believed that many ideologies of the party fitted the country's needs as a whole that could become a progressive consensus.
As for the implementation for hudud laws, we cannot see the possibility for its implementation at the moment and in the future, its implementation possibility could be reduced through check and balance.
I would like to say that this is a Chinese's thought transformation.
When Pas became more enlightened and moderate, it was able to gain support from some Malay and non-Muslim voters. Otherwise, if it keeps its rigid dogma and remains conservative like what it did in 2004, it would be cast aside.
This would have to refer back to the remarks made by Pas deputy spiritual leader Datuk Dr Haron Din that said once Pas gains the federal regime, it will amend the Federal Constitution to implement hudud laws.
Such remarks is not surprising as Haron Din belongs to the elder generation of the party, which is more conservative. Meanwhile, the party's pragmatic group and professionals do not seem to agree with him.
Of course, Haron Din does not represent the whole party. His reply to the readers on the website does not necessarily reflect the stand of the party too. Besides, his remarks made on the website might be meant to satisfy the party's loyal supporters.
We must understand that Pas has its own complexity as there are different views, as well as different leadership styles within the party. Pas is still groping for its path.
In all fairness, Pas is an Islamic party because it comes together with religious concepts. What we can see is, it is quite impossible for Pas to deny the concept of Islamic state and most importantly, is whether such concept can be implemented and whether it will be included in the implementation agenda.
Certainly, the Chinese community and other non-Muslims may solemnly tell Pas that our concept is to maintain secular lifestyle, as well as to defend our rights conferred by the Federal Constitution.
We can find common space only through mutual respect. (By TAY TIAN YAN/ Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE/ Sin Chew Daily)